The Conservative party faced criticism for defending a frontbencher who is representing Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich in a legal dispute. Justice minister Jake Richards condemned shadow attorney general David Wolfson’s involvement with Abramovich as a conflict of interest. Richards criticized Kemi Badenoch’s defense of the situation, calling it weak leadership. He suggested Wolfson should resign from his shadow cabinet position if he continues to represent Abramovich. The Tories dismissed Labour’s accusations as politically motivated.
It was revealed that Lord Wolfson is advising Abramovich in a legal battle with the Jersey government over assets worth more than £5.3 billion. Meanwhile, the UK government is seeking over £2.5 billion from Abramovich for the benefit of Ukraine.
In another development, Labour leader Keir Starmer issued an ultimatum to Abramovich to transfer funds to aid Ukraine. However, Abramovich argued that the assets cannot be moved until the Jersey proceedings conclude.
Richards raised concerns about the conflict of interest, emphasizing that Wolfson’s representation of Abramovich while advising on Russia-Ukraine matters poses a significant ethical issue. He called for action from Badenoch to address the situation promptly.
The Ukraine Solidarity Campaign expressed alarm over Wolfson’s role, questioning the Tories’ stance on Russia and suggesting a potential alignment with Nigel Farage’s views on Russia. The group urged emergency legislation to prevent sanctioned individuals from exploiting the legal system for personal gain.
Abramovich, who sold Chelsea FC in 2022, is embroiled in a dispute over the transfer of funds intended for humanitarian causes linked to the Ukraine conflict. The frozen assets are at the center of a standoff between Abramovich’s legal team and the government.
In correspondence to Kemi Badenoch, Richards highlighted the conflict of interest in Wolfson’s dual roles and urged clarity on the party’s position regarding Abramovich’s financial obligations to Ukraine.
The Tories defended Wolfson, stating that he is not involved in the Chelsea FC matter and accused Labour of misinterpreting legal practices. They emphasized their support for Ukraine and criticized Labour’s accusations as baseless.