From curious onlookers to international media outlets, there was a shared anticipation to catch a glimpse of Britain’s ousted former prince. The closest they came was witnessing two of Andrew’s security personnel departing from the gates of his soon-to-be former residence. However, the vehicle that left Royal Lodge post-4pm was not transporting the now-renamed Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.
Media crews from distant locations like Australia had assembled outside the gates since early morning, eager to witness Andrew’s first public appearance following the revocation of his royal status and eviction from his no-cost mansion. Each passing vehicle through the gates was scrutinized for any hint, fueling speculation about the initiation of moving trucks to transfer Andrew’s possessions to his new abode at Sandringham.
Among the vehicles observed was a truck from a beverage company. The driver, with a light-hearted comment, injected some humor into the solemn atmosphere by joking, “I’m delivering his farewell drinks.” This momentary relief from the gloomy weather contrasted with Andrew’s current predicament, as he had exhausted all his options.
Local residents and tourists near Windsor Castle echoed a sentiment of disappointment towards the monarchy, mirroring a broader national sentiment. One individual, Roy Davies, expressed disillusionment, emphasizing that Andrew’s actions had been a continuous disappointment. Davies believed the King’s actions were an attempt to salvage the royal reputation but feared that public sentiment had irrevocably turned against the monarchy.
Critics like Lara Delaney-Gray highlighted how the Andrew scandal had tarnished the royal family’s image, emphasizing that no one, regardless of status, was above accountability. Student Callum O’Neil and his friend Marcus Larking underscored the challenges the royal family faced in restoring public trust, given the lasting impact of controversies like Andrew’s.
While some, like Polly Gledstone, found hope in future monarchs William and Kate, they also acknowledged the irreversible harm caused by Prince Charles’ delayed intervention with Prince Andrew. Gledstone lamented the belated actions taken, suggesting that damage to the monarchy’s reputation had been accumulating for two decades.
Overall, the public’s view on the monarchy appeared divided, with a growing sentiment of skepticism and a desire for accountability and transparency within the royal family.